Whatever we all have to say about Wikileaks and Julian Assange, any lingering question marks about their credibility should be blown out of the water by the fact that they just unleashed a supervolcano of data — the entire unredacted Cablegate archive. Certainly, it seemed like they had run out of steam — ostensibly holding back information as a bargaining chip on Assange’s embattled head. From the Independent:
The contrast between what is happening within the WikiLeaks of today compared with this time last year could hardly be more stark. Last summer, Julian Assange was on the cusp of becoming one of the world’s most recognised faces. Now, he is waging a battle to secure his own freedom as the organisation he founded struggles to replicate its past successes.
Even before last year’s string of exposés, the Australian’s whistleblowing platform had been up and running for the best part of four years and boasted a string of successful scoops that it was rightly proud of.
But in July, WikiLeaks monumentally upped its game when it released a database of 76,000 war logs from Afghanistan, sending its fortunes (both literally and figuratively) soaring. In October, it followed up with a further 400,000 war logs from Iraq and then, as the year came to a close, came the coup de grâce – an enormous tranche of secret cables from US embassies across the globe that allowed us all to take a peek into the often bitchy, snide, corrupt and double-dealing world of international diplomacy.
And there were promises of more to come. Assange said he had access to the hard drive of a major banking executive – thought to be someone high up in Bank of America. A famous whistleblower from Switzerland even flew over to London to hand over CDs containing, we were informed, damning details of tax dodging within Switzerland’s notoriously secretive financial system. There were also promises of a further video showing a missile strike on the Afghan village of Granai which killed scores of civilians. When would the leaks end, we asked?
Fast-forward six months and to all intents and purposes the leaks have indeed stopped. If you discount the ongoing publication of the State Department cables, which until this week were trickling out in dribs and drabs, we have seen no major new exposés published by WikiLeaks so far this year. No Bank of America scandals, no dodgy tax dossiers, no missile-strike videos.
But a Guardian leak seems to have changed all that, and Assange has gone for broke. Full political ramifications? Perhaps a black swan clusterflock.
Aziz I think you need to show some love for Julian Assange. That guy just put his balls to the wall.
Well his hand was forced by The Grauniad. But either he is very, very brave, or as editor he is certain that there is enough material here to keep him Daniel-Ellsberg-safe.
Why is this guy hold up in a Rothschild house and protected by their attorneys?
Maybe it’s for real… but perhaps it’s something more…
What, does everyone think the Rothschilds are in league with the CIA, the man-in-the moon and the flying spaghetti monster?
I think the house of Rothschild make great wine…
But really I think this could be a massive trigger of destabiliser. And which side of the equation has the most to lose from destabilisation?
The problem with the conspiracist view of history is that it is black-swan-free.
To “balzac”
” And which side of the equation has the most to lose from destabilisation?”
Don’t know, but in the long run, the people have the most to gain from destabilization
Yeah, pretty much.
I was replying to “Amoonymous”. My reply was not placed beneath it.
Robert: I apologize, the threading doesn’t work very well. Soon (in 2-3 months) I will be moving this blog to a new server, and improving the commenting system. As it is I recommend that commenters address who they are responding to by name.
Do you have any video of that? I’d want to find out more details.