Joe Wiesenthal presents an interesting case study:
These two charts basically explain everything.
The first chart shows the yield on the Swedish 5-year bond.
As you can see, it’s absolutely plummeting right now.
Now here’s a look at its neighbor, Finland, and the yields on its 5-year bond.
Basically they look identical all through the year up until November and then BAM. Finnish yields are exploding higher, right as Swedish yields are blasting lower.
The only obvious difference between the two: Finland is part of the Eurozone, meaning it can’t print its own money. Sweden has no such risk.
This is a narrow version of something that much of the media picks up on earlier last week that UK gilts were trading with a lower yield that German bonds, a reflection of the same principle: In UK the government can print. In Germany, it can’t.
Yes — investors are happier with the idea of buying bonds which may be debased by money printing, than they are with the idea of buying bonds which may be defaulted on because the sovereign cannot print. But there is another element at play here, which may be much bigger.
Easing, of any sort won’t solve the underlying global problem — as explained by Reinhart and Rogoff in better detail than I have ever done — of excessive debt levels. By conducting QE (i.e. taking sovereign debt out of the market) governments are simply artificially contracting the supply, and in my view pumping up a debt bubble.
It’s important to consider Japan here — yields in Japan are as low as ever, and creditors are still taking their pound of flesh. That can’t be a bubble, can it? Creditors aren’t losing their money? Well, it depends how you define return on investment. Investors in Japanese bonds may be getting their money back, but Japanese society is slowly being strangled by a lack of organic growth and a lack of any real kind of creative destruction. Wages and living standards fall while unemployment rises. So Japan has become zombified, and in theory similar cases like the United States and Britain should follow down the path of death by slow Keynesianism (they won’t, because they are far more combustible societies than Japan, but that is another story for another day).
In light of all that, while the Teutonic monetarist hawkery may superficially look stupid, if we look at the resulting Euro-implosion as a potential trigger to crash global markets, burst the global bond bubble, trigger a cascade of AIG -esque events, culminating in the breakdown of the global financial system, a debt reset, and a new global financial order well then it’s really quite clever. Ultimately, a debt reset is what is needed to effectuate new organic growth and new jobs, and to clear out the withered remains of umpteen bubbles that have been created in the last twenty years through easy money.
I doubt that the stern bureaucrats at the ECB are anywhere near as clever or far-sighted as this (their most significant concern appears to be sound monetarist economics) but there is quite possibly genius in this stupidity.
So — rather than death by hawkery, I foresee rebirth.
Of course, on the other hand the “hawks” may just end up printing like their American counterparts.
Here you go, how to save the Swedish economy..or any economy come to that:
~The Dippylomat esq.
Krugman and others pointed out a few weeks ago that the main problem with Bernanke is that he is too credible, and that the best route out is for the Fed to engage in a little buffoonery, bust out the Hawaiian shirts and bongs, etc.
While in seriousness the buffoon approach is just a twist on the totally discredited inflation expectations one (doesn’t address underlying issues, etc, etc, blah, blah, blah) your response is noted as fucking hilarious.
If you don’t löaught then you cry though, eh?
Another news bulletin back from The Motherland informs me that we will be back in recession within months.
Ho hum..I am off to rustle some reindeer.
Ah The Pixies, such happy memories from the Reading Festival 1989.
Pingback: Yglesias Recognises the Death of Capitalism « azizonomics