Capitalism Explained For Angela Merkel

Europe’s new Führer (yes — I just went there) doesn’t seem to understand what capitalism is, or how markets work.

Stern-faced Teutonic Austerity

From Felix Salmon:

Ms Merkel agreed that private sector bondholders would not be asked to bear some of the losses in any future sovereign debt restructuring, as she had insisted this year in the case of Greece’s second bail-out. However, future eurozone bonds will still include collective action clauses providing for potential voluntary rescheduling of private debt.

Ms Merkel said it was imperative to show that Europe was a “safe place to invest”.

To understand just how stupid this is, all you need to do is go back and read Michael Lewis’s Ireland article. The fateful decision in Ireland was to take the insolvent banks and give them a blanket bailout, with the banks’ creditors all getting 100 cents on the euro. That only served to put a positively evil debt burden onto the Irish people, forcing a massive austerity program and causing untold billions of euros in foregone growth, while bailing out lenders who deserved no such thing.

Are we really going to repeat — on a much larger scale — the very same mistake that Ireland made? Does no one in Europe realize that this is the single worst thing they can do?

Salmon is correct, but there is a bigger issue at play here — this kind of nonsensical rubbish is exactly what has turned first Japan, and now America into zombie economies.

Showing that Europe is a “safe place to invest” effectively means rigging the market to eliminate sovereign default, or any kind of behaviour that threatens “systemic stability”. Of course, as the last few years have shown, the system is too interconnected for large entities fail. The reactionary perspective on this is to bail out everything again and again and again. The realistic perspective is that no such system is sustainable. Worse, no such system allows for any kind of capitalism.

Capitalism means both successes and failures. It is a fundamentally experimental system, with a continuous feedback mechanism — the market, and ultimately profit and loss. Ideas that work are rewarded with financial success, and ideas that don’t are punished with failure. With capitalism, systems, ideas and firms that fail to produce what the market wants fail. They go bankrupt. Their assets, and their debt is liquidated.

When that mechanism is suspended by a government or central bank that thinks it knows best — and that a system that is too interconnected to fail is worth saving at any cost — the result is almost always stagnation. This is for a number of reasons — most obviously that bailouts sustain crippling debt levels, and are paid for through contractionary austerity, which is what Salmon was getting at. But it is larger than just that.

In nature, ideas and schemes that work are rewarded — and ideas and schemes that don’t work are punished. Our ancestors who correctly judged the climate, soil and rainfall and planted crops that flourished were rewarded with a bumper harvest. Those who planted the wrong crops did not get a bailout — they got a lean harvest, and were forced to either learn from their mistakes, or perish.

These bailouts have tried to turn nature on its head — bailed out bankers and institutions have not been forced by failure to learn from their mistakes, because governments and regulators protected them from failure.

The darkest side to this zombification is that it takes resources from the productive, the young, the creative, and the needy and channels them to the zombies. Vast sums spent on rescue packages to keep the zombie system alive might have been available to increase the intellectual capabilities of the youth, or to support basic research and development, or to build better physical infrastructure, or to create new and innovative companies and products.

Zombification kills competition, too: when companies fail, it leaves a gap in the market that has to be filled, either by an expanding competitor, or by a new business. With failures now being kept on life-support, gaps in the market are fewer.

Japan has experienced twenty hellish years of zombification, all because they suspended capitalism in favour of systemic stability and creditors getting their pound of flesh. America did virtually the same thing, and the result has been three years of stagnation. Now — if Merkel gets here way — Europe will face the same thing.

Without experimental capitalism societies stagnate. That is the lesson policy makers — especially Europe’s new Führer — need to learn.

16 thoughts on “Capitalism Explained For Angela Merkel

  1. Ask a corporatist a question, get a corporatist answer.
    They live in a world of “fairness”, leading to politicaly acceptable profits (low) and matching investor acceptable losses (lower).

    Excellent article
    I knew there was a reason I’d blog rolled you🙂

    • When all is said we can recite the old USSR mantra of fairness: I’m poor, your poor, we’re all poor together.

      As to any doubters, we have the example of Japan for all to see.

  2. Great post. Amazing how so few people get it. Pain deferred is almost always pain multiplied.

    What amazes me is how long they have been able to keep kicking the can, keep keeping the lid on. Things that can’t go on forever, don’t. When this blows, watch out…

    • It breaks down when the absurdity of the financial economy spills over into the physical economy.

      It breaks down when Atlas Shrugs, through Atlas in this case is the manufacturing, energy and resource base in China, the middle east, Africa, etc

  3. I give you 10/10 for trying to convince the world of the pitfalls of the current policy decisions, but I fear we are too small a voice in the expanse of Public Sector Bureaucracy, Politicians Populist Policies and Big Business Welfare.

    We see the Big Picture because we are trained in different scools of thought, but to the average voter, economics is another language. Politicians therefore are at ther mercy of vested interests.

    I hope some generous Billionaire gives you a big fat donation for your hard work and research.

    • I appreciate your kind view, Buddy, but I think the most generous thing that anybody who reads my blog can do is e-mail various articles (alongside articles by Nassim Taleb, etc) to their political leaders.

      If there are any HNWIs or institutional investors reading this don’t give your money to me or the US Treasury, invest it in alt. energy (e.g. solar), and decentralised manufacturing (e.g. 3d printing) so we can break out of our civilizational addiction to oil, which is really the biggest problem in the world today.

  4. If what you say is true, Aziz, the America is deeply caught in the innovation trap, whereby a business (in this case an entire country) is beholden to its existing source of profit (in this case system) well beyond its useful life. Their entire structure is built around perpetuating the status quo until their final source of profit dries up, to be replaced by a new, more nimble upstart.

    If Obama pursues this course, he will make Bush look like a boy scout in the stupidity stakes.

  5. Pingback: Who’s the Communist Now? « azizonomics

  6. Pingback: Corporatism and Income Inequality « azizonomics

  7. Pingback: Angela Merkel Still Doesn’t Understand Capitalism « azizonomics

  8. Pingback: Angela Merkel Still Doesn’t Understand Capitalism [azizonomics] « Mktgeist blog

  9. Pingback: Angela Merkel Still Doesn’t Understand Capitalism

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s