An end to this bullshit.
Honestly, why is an inert and essentially useless metal like gold the best performing major asset class of the last ten years? It doesn’t do anything. It doesn’t create any return. It just sits. It’s a store of long-term purchasing power.
And most importantly it is a hedge against counter-party risk.
What is counter-party risk?
Counter-party risk is the external risk investments face. The counter-party risk to fiat currency is that the counter-party — in this case the government — will fail to deliver a system where that fiat money will be acceptable as payment for goods and services. The counter-party risk to a bond or a derivative or a swap is that the counter-party — in this case the debtor — will default on their obligations.
Gold — at least the physical form — has negligible counter-party risk. It’s been recognised as valuable for thousands of years.
Counter-party risk is a symptom of dependency. And the global financial system is a paradigm of inter-dependency: inter-connected leverage, soaring gross derivatives exposure, abstract securitisations.
When everyone in the system owes shedloads of money to everyone else the failure of one can often snowball into the failure of the many.
That, as much as anything else, is the real problem with all the policy that has gone into preserving at stabilising the financial system since 2008. It has preserved a system full of counter-party risk, where one big failure could snowball into the failure of the entire system.
Mark Spitznagel wrote a fantastic article for the WSJ a couple of days ago about the current shape of the global financial system:
The conifer’s secret to longevity lies in a paradox: Their conquest has been largely the result of episodes of massive forest destruction. When virtually all else is gone, conifers show their strength and prowess as nature’s opportunists. How? They have adapted to evade competitors by out-surviving them and then occupying their real estate after catastrophic fires.
First, the conifer takes root where no one else will go (think cold, short growing seasons and rocky, nutrient-poor soil). Here, they find the time, space and much-needed sunlight to thrive early on and build their defenses (such as height, canopy and thick bark). When fire hits, those hardy few conifers that survive can throw their seeds onto newly cleared, sunlit and nutrient-released space. For them, fire is not foe but friend. In fact, the seed-loaded cones of many conifers open only in extreme heat.
This is nature’s model: overgrowth, followed by destruction of the overgrowth, and then the subsequent new growth of the healthiest and most robust, which ultimately leaves the forest and the entire ecosystem better off than they were before.
Pondering these trees, it is not too much of a stretch to consider the financial forests of our own making, where excess credit and malinvestment thrive for a time, only to be destroyed—and then the releasing of capital into markets where competition has been wiped out. The Austrian school economists understood this well, basing a whole theory around this investment cycle.
Let’s hope that policy makers can grasp this reality and allow nature to do what she does best: change, renew and revitalise.
Merry Christmas, everyone.
You may be too demanding. Throughout history and throughout the world (even in the very near history) most men have been lucky to just be able to hold on to what they have. This is why crazy people who have lived their entire lives in Keynesian bubbles (and hence have no idea how reality works) can think of such crazy ideas like “printing our way to prosperity”.
Otherwise, Merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas and a happy new year. I hope the governments and the “financial world” recognizes our underlying problems so the next year does not become “merry crisis and a happy new fear.”
I hope I am not being excessively optimistic.
Thanks for the great reads, Aziz and commenters.
Hope you all had a lovely time with your families. I chowed into a lot of turkey. Turkey is known to increase happy brain chemicals, so I am optimistic for the new year!
HMMM January effect.
P.S. I decided that present giving is so vulgar. I decided to hand out money to the homeless.
The retailers hate me!
Ukraine is now basing its currency on Gold.
The Ukrainians always get shafted by Vampire Squid.
I think this is the end of the gold market. ( I called it when it was over 1800)
The big news today, in my opinion, was this:
Pingback: Stiglitz vs Krugman « azizonomics
Pingback: The Non-Paradox of Inactivity « azizonomics
Pingback: Breaking the Banks « azizonomics
Pingback: Out of the Liquidity Trap? « azizonomics
Pingback: The New Goldbuggery « azizonomics
Pingback: Warren Buffett Priced in Gold « azizonomics
Pingback: WARREN BUFFETT QUOTATO IN ORO | Movimento Libertario
Pingback: Warren Buffett Priced In Gold: Can You Say Bubble? Or, More To The Point, Can You Say Bursting?
Pingback: Identifying a Treasury Crash « azizonomics
Pingback: Gold’s Value Today « azizonomics
Pingback: Guest Post: Gold’s Value Today » A Taoistmonk's Life
Pingback: Golden Cognitive Dissonance « azizonomics
Pingback: Golden Cognitive Dissonance [Azizonomics] « Mktgeist blog
Pingback: Guest Post: Golden Cognitive Dissonance » A Taoistmonk's Life