At 8:58 P.M. on Tuesday, Israel’s 2012 war against Iran came to a quiet end. The capricious plans for a huge aerial attack were returned to the deep recesses of safes and hearts. The war may not have been canceled but it has certainly been postponed. For a while, at least, we can sound the all clear: It won’t happen this year. Until further notice, Israel Air Force Flight 007 will not be taking off.
According to a war simulation conducted by the U.S. Central Command, the Iranians could kill 200 Americans with a single missile response to an Israeli attack. An investigative committee would not spare any admiral or general, minister or president. The meaning of this U.S. scenario is that the blood of these 200 would be on Israel’s head.
Yeah. But I don’t really think that there was any real chance of a strike, even before that, and I haven’t for a long time.
As I wrote in January:
The real threat to Israel and America is not inaction on Iran, but excessive force. Iran poses little threat, but military intervention to effect regime change in Tehran runs the risk of huge and widespread blowback throughout the Muslim world: terrorism, guerrilla warfare, and deeper intergovernmental hostility, a breakdown of regional trade, and even a wider land war involving Eurasian nations who wish to protect Iran, including China and Russia.
The curious thing is that if the critical wargame was one involving a retaliatory Iranian missile strike, perhaps the people at the Pentagon would be wiser to allocate their not inconsiderable resources to a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, instead? After all, the economic damage of destabilising global trade seems a much greater danger to global, American and Israeli security than an Iranian retaliation.
From the Huffington Post:
Blocking the Strait of Hormuz would create an international and economic calamity of unprecedented severity. Here are the crude realities. America uses approximately 19 to 20 million barrels of oil per day, almost half of which is imported. If we lose just 1 million barrels per day, or suffer the type of damage sustained from Hurricane Katrina, our government will open the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), which offers a mere six- to eight-week supply of unrefined crude oil. If we lose 1.5 million barrels per day, or approximately 7.5 percent, we will ask our allies in the 28-member International Energy Agency to open their SPRs and otherwise assist. If we lose 2 million barrels per day, or 10 percent, for a protracted period, government crisis monitors say the chaos will be so catastrophic, they cannot even model it. One government oil crisis source recently told me: “We cannot put a price tag on it. If it happens, just cash in your 401(k).”
Of course, there are plenty of examples of nations enacting policies that end up damaging their own interests, not least America’s costly, destructive and illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003. But given the deep and serious opposition that Netanyahu faces from within the Israeli establishment (e.g. Meir Dagan, the former Mossad chief), it seems unlikely that they will at any point engage in such a strike. The rhetoric appears to be mostly designed stir up resistance to the Iranian regime (although frankly this appears to have had the opposite effect — galvanising the Iranian people to rally around a relatively unpopular regime).
Question how much money was made by
1. USA Oil Interests (they have to pay a commission to Israel)
2. Saudi Arabia
During this elevated period of oil price rises, due to the war posturing?
I feel like I am getting money stolen from me every time I go to the Petrol/Gas station.
Now that it is approaching summer in the Northern hemisphere the rich oil oligarchs can go on their vacations with our hard earned money.
Note to self: Stock up on fuel supplies during the lull before the storm.
With or without war, I think oil prices will stay far above cost of extraction.
The mighty Aussie Dollar. Sorry for the long link, I am not an IT expert.
Dame Meli Melba (Opera Singer) Side 1
Sir John Monash (War General) Side 2
Opera and War. How quaint.
P.S. We use high tech polymer plastic. Not that Barbaric relic paper.
Yeah. An American-Israeli strike will shoot us in the foot.
Depends how badly we want to do it.
As I say in the article, we’ve shot ourselves in the foot many times before. Thankfully, I think there is something of an intellectual renaissance going on in the West, and we will hopefully avoid this obstacle.
Ex Israel Security Chief has no faith in current Israeli leadership